contact me with thoughts/suggestions on this dialogue
Non-binary Gender Notation
Seeking to further understand gender and identity positions through set theory mathematics and semantics (as well as how it manifests in the logic of the unconscious), below is a drafted equation for Non-binary interrelation.
∞−{[F, M)[M,F)} { } :used to denote compound statements, with perceived ‘value’ components, as the binary discourse instantiates what F or M is and what it is not, yet the sites exist in relation to each other . ∞− :not a real number but a mathematical notation used to indicate that there is no boundary in the negative direction. :the union of a collection of sets, which is the set of all elements in the collection. Through the function of the union, sets can be combined and related to each other. The notation [F,M) is used to indicate an interval from F to M that is inclusive of F but exclusive of M. That is, [F,M) would be the set of all ‘real’ gender identity positions between F and M, including F but not M. Vise verse.